Sunday, November 30, 2014

First History of  Evola break out in the world

1976

Sudan outbreak

=================

The first known outbreak of EVD was identified only after the fact, occurring between June and November 1976 inNzara, South Sudan,[20][108] (then part of Sudan) and was caused by Sudan virus (SUDV). The Sudan outbreak infected 284 people and killed 151. The first identifiable case in Sudan occurred on 27 June in a storekeeper in a cotton factory in Nzara, who was hospitalized on 30 June and died on 6 July.[109][18] While the WHO medical staff involved in the Sudan outbreak were aware that they were dealing with a heretofore unknown disease, the actual "positive identification" process and the naming of the virus did not occur until some months later in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.[109]

Zaire outbreak

=================
On 26 August 1976, a second outbreak of EVD began in Yambuku, a small rural village in Mongala District in northern Zaire (now known as the Democratic Republic of the Congo).[110][111] This outbreak was caused by EBOV, formerly designated Zaire ebolavirus, which is a different member of the genus Ebolavirus than in the first Sudan outbreak. The first person infected with the disease was village school headmaster Mabalo Lokela, who began displaying symptoms on 26 August 1976.[112] Lokela had returned from a trip to Northern Zaire near the Central African Republic border, having visited the Ebola River between 12 and 22 August. He was originally believed to havemalaria and was given quinine. However, his symptoms continued to worsen, and he was admitted to Yambuku Mission Hospital on 5 September. Lokela died on 8 September, 14 days after he began displaying symptoms.[113][114][115]
Soon after Lokela's death, others who had been in contact with him also died, and people in the village of Yambuku began to panic. This led the country's Minister of Health along with Zaire President Mobutu Sese Seko to declare the entire region, including Yambuku and the country's capital, Kinshasa, a quarantine zone. No one was permitted to enter or leave the area, with roads, waterways, and airfields placed under martial law. Schools, businesses and social organizations were closed.[116] Researchers from the CDC, including Peter Piot, co-discoverer of Ebola, later arrived to assess the effects of the outbreak, observing that "the whole region was in panic."[117][118][119] Piot concluded that the Belgian nuns had inadvertently started the epidemic by giving unnecessary vitamin injections to pregnant women, without sterilizing the syringes and needles. The outbreak lasted 26 days, with the quarantine lasting 2 weeks. Among the reasons that researchers speculated caused the disease to disappear, were the precautions taken by locals, the quarantine of the area, and discontinuing the injections.[116]
During this outbreak, Dr. Ngoy Mushola recorded the first clinical description of EVD in Yambuku, where he wrote the following in his daily log: "The illness is characterized with a high temperature of about 39 °C (102 °F), hematemesis, diarrhea with blood, retrosternal abdominal pain, prostration with "heavy" articulations, and rapid evolution death after a mean of 3 days."[120]
The virus responsible for the initial outbreak, first thought to be Marburg virus, was later identified as a new type of virus related to marburgviruses. Virus strain samples isolated from both outbreaks were named as the "Ebola virus" after the Ebola River, located near the originally identified viral outbreak site in Zaire.[18] Reports conflict about who initially coined the name: either Karl Johnson of the American CDC team[121] or Belgian researchers.[122] Subsequently a number of other cases were reported, almost all centered on the Yambuku mission hospital or having close contact with another case.[112] 318 cases and 280 deaths (a 88 percent fatality rate) occurred in Zaire.[123] Although it was assumed that the two outbreaks were connected, scientists later realized that they were caused by two distinct ebolaviruses, SUDV and EBOV.[111] The Zaire outbreak was contained with the help of the World Health Organization and transport from the Congolese air force, by quarantining villagers, sterilizing medical equipment, and providing protective clothing.

1995 to 2012

==============
The second major outbreak occurred in Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo) in 1995, affecting 315 and killing 254.[124][125] The next major outbreak occurred inUganda in 2000, affecting 425 and killing 224; in this case the Sudan virus was found to be the ebolavirus species responsible for the outbreak. In 2003 there was an outbreak in the Republic of the Congo that affected 143 and killed 128, a death rate of 90 percent, the highest to date.[126]
In 2004 a Russian scientist died from Ebola after sticking herself with an infected needle.[127]
Between April and August 2007, a fever epidemic[124] in a four-village region[125] of the Democratic Republic of the Congo was confirmed in September to have cases of Ebolavirus.[128] Many people who attended the recent funeral of a local village chief died.[125] The 2007 outbreak eventually affected 264 individuals and resulted in the deaths of 187.[1]
On 30 November 2007, the Uganda Ministry of Health confirmed an outbreak of Ebola in the Bundibugyo District in Western Uganda. After confirmation of samples tested by the United States National Reference Laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization confirmed the presence of a new species of Ebolavirus, which was tentatively named Bundibugyo.[129] The WHO reported 149 cases of this new strain and 37 of those led to deaths.[1]
The WHO confirmed two small outbreaks in Uganda in 2012. The first outbreak affected 7 people and resulted in the death of 4 and the second affected 24, resulting in the death of 17. The Sudan variant was responsible for both outbreaks.[1]
On 17 August 2012, the Ministry of Health of the Democratic Republic of the Congo reported an outbreak of the Ebola-Bundibugyo variant[130] in the eastern region.[131][132] Other than its discovery in 2007, this was the only time that this variant has been identified as the ebolavirus responsible for an outbreak. The WHO revealed that the virus had sickened 57 people and claimed 29 lives. The probable cause of the outbreak was tainted bush meat hunted by local villagers around the towns of Isiro and Viadana.[1][133]

2013 to 2014 West African outbreak

=================================================================
Increase over time in the cases and deaths during the 2013–2014 outbreak
In March 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported a major Ebola outbreak in Guinea, a western African nation.[134]Researchers traced the outbreak to a two-year old child who died December 2013.[135][136] The disease then rapidly spread to the neighboring countries of Liberia and Sierra Leone. It is the largest Ebola outbreak ever documented, and the first recorded in the region.[134]
On 8 August 2014, the WHO declared the epidemic to be an international public health emergency. Urging the world to offer aid to the affected regions, the Director-General said, "Countries affected to date simply do not have the capacity to manage an outbreak of this size and complexity on their own. I urge the international community to provide this support on the most urgent basis possible."[137] By mid-August 2014, Doctors Without Borders reported the situation in Liberia's capital Monrovia as "catastrophic" and "deteriorating daily". They reported that fears of Ebola among staff members and patients had shut down much of the city’s health system, leaving many people without treatment for other conditions.[138] By late August 2014, the disease had spread to Nigeria, and one case was reported in Senegal.[139][140] [141][142] On 30 September 2014, the first confirmed case of Ebola in the United States was diagnosed.[143] The patient died 8 days later.[144]
Aside from the human cost, the outbreak has severely eroded the economies of the affected countries. A Financial Times report suggested the economic impact of the outbreak could kill more people than the virus itself. As of 23 September, in the three hardest hit countries, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea, only 893 treatment beds were available even though the current need was 2122 beds. In a 26 September statement, the WHO said, "The Ebola epidemic ravaging parts of West Africa is the most severe acute public health emergency seen in modern times. Never before in recorded history has a biosafety level four pathogen infected so many people so quickly, over such a broad geographical area, for so long."[145] The WHO reported that by 25 August more than 216 health-care workers were among the dead, partly due to the lack of equipment and long hours.[146] On 23 October, the Malian government confirmed its first case.[147] In response, UNMEER, in cooperation with the Logistics Cluster, air-lifted 1,050 kg of personal protective equipment (PPE) and body bags from Monrovia to Mali.[148] As of 4 November 2014, 13,268 suspected cases and 4,960 deaths had been reported;[10][107] however, the WHO has said that these numbers may be vastly underestimated.[148][149][150]

2014 DRC Congo outbreak

==========================
An outbreak in Boende District in Equatorial Province was stopped effectively with flexible organization and funding,[151] as well as social mobilization led by UNICEF advising action people could use.[152][153] The DRC outbreak was from a local Ebola strain and not the one from West Africa (WHO).[154]

2014 spread outside of Africa

=========================
As of 15 October 2014, there have been 17 cases of Ebola treated outside of Africa, four of whom have died.[155] In early October, Teresa Romero, a 44-year-old Spanish nurse, contracted Ebola after caring for a priest who had been repatriated from West Africa. This was the first transmission of the virus to occur outside of Africa.[156] On 20 October, it was announced that Teresa Romero had tested negative for the Ebola virus, suggesting that she may have recovered from Ebola infection.[157]
On 19 September, Eric Duncan flew from his native Liberia to Texas; 5 days later he began showing symptoms and visited a hospital, but was sent home. His condition worsened and he returned to the hospital on 28 September, where he died on 8 October.[158] Health officials confirmed a diagnosis of Ebola on 30 September—the first case in the United States.[40] On 12 October, the CDC confirmed that a nurse in Texas who had treated Duncan was found to be positive for the Ebola virus, the first known case of the disease to be contracted in the United States.[159] On 15 October, a second Texas health-care worker who had treated Duncan was confirmed to have the virus.[160] They have both recovered.
On 23 October, a doctor in New York City, who returned to the United States from Guinea after working with Doctors Without Borders, tested positive for Ebola. His case is unrelated to the Texas cases.[161]

Society and culture

Weaponization

==================
Ebolavirus is classified as a biosafety level 4 agent, as well as a Category A bioterrorism agent by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It has the potential to be weaponized for use in biological warfare,[162][163] and was investigated by Biopreparat for such use, but might be difficult to prepare as a weapon of mass destruction because the virus becomes ineffective quickly in open air.[164] Fake emails pretending to be Ebola information from the WHO or the Mexican Government have in 2014 been misused to spread computer malware.[165]

Literature

============
Richard Preston's 1995 best-selling book, The Hot Zone, dramatized the Ebola outbreak in Reston, Virginia.[166]
William Close's 1995 Ebola: A Documentary Novel of Its First Explosion and 2002 Ebola: Through the Eyes of the People focused on individuals' reactions to the 1976 Ebola outbreak in Zaire.[167]
Tom Clancy's 1996 novel, Executive Orders, involves a Middle Eastern terrorist attack on the United States using an airborne form of a deadly Ebola virus strain named "Ebola Mayinga" (see Mayinga N'Seka).[168]
As the Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa developed in 2014, a number of popular self-published and well-reviewed books containing sensational and misleading information about the disease appeared in electronic and printed formats. The authors of some such books admitted that they lacked medical credentials and were not technically qualified to give medical advice. The World Health Organization and the United Nations stated that such misinformation had contributed to the spread of the disease.[169]

Other animals

Wild animals

===========
Ebola has a high mortality among primates.[97] Frequent outbreaks of Ebola may have resulted in the deaths of 5,000 gorillas.[170] Outbreaks of Ebola may have been responsible for an 88 percent decline in tracking indices of observed chimpanzee populations in 420 square kilometer Lossi Sanctuary between 2002 and 2003.[171] Transmission among chimpanzees through meat consumption constitutes a significant risk factor, whereas contact between the animals, such as touching dead bodies and grooming, is not.[172]
Recovered carcasses from gorillas contain multiple Ebola virus strains, which suggest multiple introductions of the virus. Bodies decompose quickly and carcasses are not infectious after 3 to 4 days. Contact between gorilla groups is rare, suggesting transmission among gorilla groups is unlikely, and that outbreaks result from transmission between viral reservoir and animal populations.[171]

Domestic animals

================
In 2012 it was demonstrated that the virus can travel without contact from pigs to nonhuman primates, although the same study failed to achieve transmission in that manner between primates.[47][173]
Dogs may become infected with EBOV but not develop symptoms. Dogs in some parts of Africa scavenge for food, and they sometimes eat EBOV-infected animals and also the corpses of humans. A 2005 survey of dogs during an EBOV outbreak found that although they remain asymptomatic, about 32 percent of dogs closest to an outbreak showed aseroprevalence for EBOV versus 9 percent of those farther away.[174] The authors concluded that there were "potential implications for preventing and controlling human outbreaks."

Reston virus

===============
For more about the outbreak in Virginia, US, see Reston virus.
In late 1989, Hazelton Research Products' Reston Quarantine Unit in Reston, Virginia, suffered an outbreak of fatal illness amongst certain lab monkeys. This lab outbreak was initially diagnosed as simian hemorrhagic fever virus (SHFV), and occurred amongst a shipment of crab-eating macaque monkeys imported from the Philippines. Hazelton's veterinary pathologist sent tissue samples from dead animals to the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland, where an ELISA test indicated the antibodies present in the tissue were a response to Ebola virus and not SHFV.[175] An electron microscopist from USAMRIID discoveredfiloviruses similar in appearance to Ebola in the tissue samples sent from Hazelton Research Products' Reston Quarantine Unit.[176]
A US Army team headquartered at USAMRIID euthanized the surviving monkeys, and brought all the monkeys to Ft. Detrick for study by the Army's veterinary pathologists and virologists, and eventual disposal under safe conditions.[175] Blood samples were taken from 178 animal handlers during the incident.[177] Of those, six animal handlers eventuallyseroconverted, including one who had cut himself with a bloody scalpel.[60][178] Despite its status as a Level‑4 organism and its apparent pathogenicity in monkeys, when the handlers did not become ill, the CDC concluded that the virus had a very low pathogenicity to humans.[178][179]
The Philippines and the United States had no previous cases of Ebola infection, and upon further isolation, researchers concluded it was another strain of Ebola, or a new filovirus of Asian origin, which they named Reston ebolavirus (RESTV) after the location of the incident.[175] Reston virus (RESTV) can be transmitted to pigs.[47] Since the initial outbreak it has since been found in nonhuman primates in Pennsylvania, Texas, and Italy,[180] where the virus had infected pigs.[181] According to the WHO, routine cleaning and disinfection of pig (or monkey) farms with sodium hypochlorite or detergents should be effective in inactivating the Reston ebolavirus. Pigs that have been infected with RESTV tend to show symptoms of the disease.

Research

=========================
A number of experimental treatments are being studied.[182] In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s animal efficacy rule is being used to demonstrate reasonable safety to obtain permission to treat people who are infected with Ebola. It is being used because the normal path for testing drugs is not possible for diseases caused by dangerous pathogens or toxins. Experimental drugs are made available for use with the approval of regulatory agencies under named patient programs, known in the US as"expanded access".[183] On 12 August 2014 the WHO released a statement that the use of not yet proven treatments is ethical in certain situations in an effort to treat or prevent the disease.[184]

Medications

===============
Researchers looking at slides of cultures of cells that make monoclonal antibodies. These are grown in a lab and the researchers are analyzing the products to select the most promising.

Antivirals

A number of antiviral medications are being studied.
·         Favipiravir, approved in Japan for stockpiling against influenza pandemics, appears to be useful in a mouse model of Ebola.[12][185] On 4 October 2014, it was reported that a French nun who contracted Ebola while volunteering in Liberia was cured with Favipiravir treatment.[186]
·         BCX4430 is a broad-spectrum small molecule antiviral drug developed by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals and undergoing animal testing as a potential human treatment for Ebola by USAMRIID.[187] The drug has been approved to progress to Phase 1 trials, expected late in 2014.[188]
·         Brincidofovir is a broad-spectrum antiviral drug. Its maker has been granted FDA approval to proceed with a trial to test its safety and efficacy in Ebola patients.[189] It has been used to treat the first patient diagnosed with Ebola in the USA, after he had recently returned from Liberia.[190][191]
·         Lamivudine, usually used to treat HIV/AIDS, was reported in September 2014 to have been used successfully to treat 13 out of 15 Ebola-infected patients by a doctor in Liberia, as part of a combination therapy also involving intravenous fluids and antibiotics to combat opportunistic bacterial infection of Ebola-compromised internal organs.[192] Western virologists have however expressed caution about the results, due to the small number of patients treated and confounding factors present. Researchers at the NIH stated that lamivudine had so far failed to demonstrate anti-Ebola activity in preliminary in vitro tests, but that they would continue to test it under different conditions and would progress it to trials if even slight evidence for efficacy is found.[193]
·         JK-05 is developed by the Chinese company Sihuan Pharmaceutical along with the Chinese Academy of Military Medical Sciences. It is reportedly being fast tracked through human trials for Ebola treatment after successful tests in mice.[194][195]
·         Lack of available treatment options has spurred research into a number of other possible antivirals targeted against Ebola,[196][197] including natural products such asscytovirin and griffithsin,[198][199] as well as synthetic drugs including DZNep,[200] FGI-103, FGI-104, FGI-106, dUY11 and LJ-001,[201] and other newer agents.[202][203][204][205][206][207][208]

Antisense technology

Other promising treatments rely on antisense technology. Both small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs) targeting EBOV RNA polymerase L protein may prevent disease in nonhuman primates.[209][210] TKM-Ebola is a small interfering RNA compound, currently being tested in a Phase I clinical trial in humans.[211][212] Sarepta Therapeutics has completed a Phase I clinical trial with its PMO protecting up to 80-100 percent of the nonhuman primates tested.[213]

Antibodies

ZMapp is a monoclonal antibody vaccine. The limited supply of the drug has been used to treat a small number of individuals infected with the Ebola virus. Although some individuals have recovered, the outcome is not considered statistically significant.[214] ZMapp has proved effective in a trial involving rhesus macaque monkeys.[211][215][216] TheBill & Melinda Gates Foundation has donated $150,000 to help Amgen increase its production, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has asked a number of centers to also increase production.[217] There was no confirmation or proof that the ZMapp drug was a factor in the recovery of two American Ebola patients, however;[218] a Spanish priest with Ebola had taken ZMapp but died afterward.[219]
Researchers in Thailand claim to have developed an antibody-based treatment for Ebola using synthesized fragments of the virus. It has not been tested against Ebola itself. Scientists from the WHO and NIH have offered to test the treatment against live Ebola virus, but there is still a great deal of development needed before human trials.[220]

Other

Two selective estrogen receptor modulators usually used to treat infertility and breast cancer (clomiphene and toremifene) have been found to inhibit the progress of Ebola virusin vitro as well as in infected mice. Ninety percent of the mice treated with clomiphene and 50 percent of those treated with toremifene survived the tests.[221] The study authors conclude that given their oral availability and history of human use, these drugs would be candidates for treating Ebola virus infection in remote geographical locations, either on their own or together with other antiviral drugs.
A 2014 study found that three ion channel blockers used in the treatment of heart arrhythmias, amiodarone, dronedarone and verapamil, block the entry of Ebola virus into cellsin vitro.[222]

Blood products

===============
The WHO has stated that transfusion of whole blood or purified serum from Ebola survivors is the therapy with the greatest potential to be implemented immediately, although there is little information as to its efficacy.[223] In September 2014, WHO issued an interim guideline for this therapy.[224] The blood serum from those who have survived an infection is currently being studied to see if it is an effective treatment.[225] During a meeting arranged by WHO, this research was deemed to be a top priority.[225] Seven of eight people with Ebola survived after receiving a transfusion of blood donated by individuals who had previously survived the infection in an 1999 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.[98][226] This treatment, however, was started late in the disease meaning they may have already been recovering on their own and the rest of their care was better than usual.[98] Thus this potential treatment remains controversial.[18] Intravenous antibodies appear to be protective in nonhuman primates who have been exposed to large doses of Ebola.[227] The WHO has approved the use of convalescent serum and whole blood products to treat people with Ebola.[228]

Vaccine

=========
Many Ebola vaccine candidates had been developed in the decade prior to 2014,[229] but as of October 2014, none had yet been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use in humans.[225][230][231] Several promising vaccine candidates have been shown to protect nonhuman primates (usually macaques) against lethal infection.[20][232] These include replication-deficient adenovirus vectors, replication-competent vesicular stomatitis (VSV) and human parainfluenza (HPIV-3) vectors, and virus-like particle preparations. Conventional trials to study efficacy by exposure of humans to the pathogen after immunization are obviously not feasible in this case. For such situations, the FDA has established the “animal rule” allowing licensure to be approved on the basis of animal model studies that replicate human disease, combined with evidence of safety and a potentially potent immune response (antibodies in the blood) from humans given the vaccine. Phase I clinical trials involve the administration of the vaccine to healthy human subjects to evaluate the immune response, identify any side effects and determine the appropriate dosage.
In September 2014, two Phase I clinical trials began for the vaccine cAd3-EBO Z, which is based on an attenuated version of a chimpanzee adenovirus (cAd3) that has been genetically altered so that it is unable to replicate in humans.[233] It was developed by NIAID in collaboration with Okairos, now a division of GlaxoSmithKline. For the trial designated VRC 20, 20 volunteers were recruited by the NIAID in Bethesda, Maryland, while three dose-specific groups of 20 volunteers each were recruited for trial EBL01 by University of Oxford, U.K.
A replication-competent vaccine based on the vesicular stomatitis virus, called VSV-EBOV, was developed by the Canadian National Microbiology Laboratory and licensed to the small company NewLink Genetics. With the strong support of the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency, it started Phase I clinical trials on healthy human subjects on 13 October 2014 at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Silver Spring, Md.[234][235][236] Also in October 2014, the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases(NIAID) was recruiting healthy human volunteers for a "Phase 1 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Prime-Boost VSV Ebola Vaccine in Healthy Adults".[237] On 20 October, the Public Health Agency of Canada began air shipment of 800 doses of the VSV-EBOV vaccine to the WHO in Geneva.[238] This vaccine is intended to be used in Phase I clinical trials, to start in late October or early November. The WHO has recruited 250 volunteers ready to begin Phase I clinical trials in four locations: Switzerland, Germany, Gabon and Kenya. If the results of this and following trials show that the earlier results in nonhuman primates are replicable in humans, this vaccine could be deployed in areas such as West Africa and would be expected to require only a single dose. Also, its efficacy in protecting nonhuman primates when administered even after viral exposure has occurred may help protect health-care workers after a suspected exposure.
The Health Ministry of Russia also claims to have developed a vaccine called Triazoverin, which is said to be effective against both Ebola and Marburg filoviruses, and might be available for clinical trials in West Africa as soon as the start of 2015.[239][240][241]
At the 8th Vaccine and ISV Conference in Philadelphia on 27−28 October 2014, Novavax Inc. reported the development in a "few weeks" of a glycoprotein (GP) nanoparticleEbola virus (EBOV GP) vaccine using their proprietary recombinant technology.[242] A recombinant protein is a protein whose code is carried by recombinant DNA. The vaccine is based on the newly published genetic sequence[243] of the 2014 Guinea Ebola strain that is responsible for the current Ebola disease epidemic in West Africa. In "preclinical models", a useful immune response was induced, and was found to be enhanced ten to a hundred-fold by the company's "Matrix-M" immunologic adjuvant. A study of the response of non-human primate to the vaccine had been initiated. Attractive features of such a vaccine could be no need for frozen storage, and the possibility of rapid scaling to manufacture of large dose quantities.